Pestel Analysis of Sapient Corp Case Study Solution

Home >> Ivey >> Sapient Corp >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Sapient Corp Case Solution

Political factors

Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption complimentary image. It is among the least corrupt countries of Asia. Some political procedures are lacking, along with civil liberties and human rights. Employees party achieved success in 2011 election, which could be harming to Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis's image considering that this celebration might decline to apply the steps.

Economic factors

Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other countries like China and India might cause a danger to Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is really high and it has the fourth most affordable infant mortality rate. The 100% population of Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the most affordable number of kids per woman on the planet. Life span rate of Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisSapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic hub.

Legal factors

Sapient Corp Case Pestel Analysis has ease of fixing solvency and the Laws are effectively enforced. It provides minority shareholders security with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary policy are suggested in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has effective public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is poor, because justices are designated on guidance of PM.