Pestel Analysis of Who’S My Boss A Online Case Study Help

Home >> Kelloggs >> Who’S My Boss A Online >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Who’S My Boss A Online Case Help

Political factors

Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. Employees party was effective in 2011 election, which could be damaging to Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party could decline to use the measures.

Economic factors

Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of saving. Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other countries like China and India may cause a risk to Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis's population lies in between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th lowest infant mortality rate. The 100% population of Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis is urban with the most affordable number of kids per female in the world. Life expectancy rate of Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population growth rate of Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisWho’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center. Its intellectual property security is also very strong. The federal government can increase the spending plan for R&D.

Legal factors

Who’S My Boss A Online Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are effectively enforced. It uses minority investors protection with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial guideline are implied in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is poor, since justices are appointed on advice of PM.