Pestel Analysis of The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Study Solution

Home >> Kelloggs >> The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Solution

Political factors

The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption complimentary image. It is amongst the least corrupt nations of Asia. Some political procedures are lacking, along with civil liberties and human rights. Workers party achieved success in 2011 election, which might be damaging to The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Pestel Analysis's image considering that this party could refuse to apply the procedures.

Economic factors

The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified labor force and has high levels of saving. The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other countries like China and India may cause a hazard to The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is really high and it has the 4th least expensive baby mortality rate. Population development rate of The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisThe Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic hub.

Legal factors

The Battle For Value 2004 Fedex Corp Vs United Parcel Service Inc Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are properly implemented. It provides minority shareholders security with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced financial policy are suggested in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has efficient public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, considering that justices are appointed on suggestions of PM.