Pestel Analysis of Monroe Clock Company B Case Study Analysis

Home >> Kelloggs >> Monroe Clock Company B >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Monroe Clock Company B Case Analysis

Political factors

Monroe Clock Company B Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption totally free image. It is among the least corrupt nations of Asia. Although, some political procedures are lacking, in addition to civil liberties and human rights. Workers party was successful in 2011 election, which could be damaging to Monroe Clock Company B Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party might refuse to use the procedures.

Economic factors

Monroe Clock Company B Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. Monroe Clock Company B Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other nations like China and India may trigger a danger to Monroe Clock Company B Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th lowest baby mortality rate. Population growth rate of Monroe Clock Company B Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisMonroe Clock Company B Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center. Its intellectual property protection is likewise extremely strong. The federal government can increase the budget plan for R&D.

Legal factors

Monroe Clock Company B Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are appropriately implemented. It provides minority shareholders defense with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced financial regulation are suggested in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is poor, given that justices are selected on recommendations of PM.