Pestel Analysis of Maverick Lodging Case Study Help

Disclaimer: This page contains sample case solution for formatting purposes only and is not the actual case solution of the said case. To get the actual case solution; order on website or contact live chat support.

Home >> Kelloggs >> Maverick Lodging >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Maverick Lodging Case Solution

Political factors

Maverick Lodging Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption totally free image. It is amongst the least corrupt countries of Asia. Some political procedures are lacking, along with civil liberties and human rights. Employees party achieved success in 2011 election, which could be harming to Maverick Lodging Case Pestel Analysis's image since this party could refuse to use the steps.

Economic factors

Maverick Lodging Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of conserving. Maverick Lodging Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other nations like China and India might trigger a hazard to Maverick Lodging Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th most affordable baby mortality rate. Population growth rate of Maverick Lodging Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Maverick Lodging Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Maverick Lodging Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are appropriately enforced. It provides minority investors defense with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial policy are suggested in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has efficient public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is poor, since justices are selected on recommendations of PM.