Pestel Analysis of Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Study Help
Home >> Kelloggs >> Lucent Technologies Inc C >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Solution
Political factors
Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption totally free image. Employees party was effective in 2011 election, which might be damaging to Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party might decline to use the measures.
Economic factors
Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. Other nations like China and India may trigger a risk to Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
The 55% of Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the fourth most affordable infant death rate. The 100% population of Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the lowest number of kids per female worldwide. Life expectancy rate of Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center.
Legal factors
Lucent Technologies Inc C Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It uses minority shareholders defense with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced monetary guideline are implied in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is poor, because justices are designated on guidance of PM.