Pestel Analysis of Lone Star Power Case Study Help
Home >> Kelloggs >> Lone Star Power >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Lone Star Power Case Help
Political factors
Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption complimentary image. It is amongst the least corrupt countries of Asia. Some political procedures are doing not have, along with civil liberties and human rights. Employees party was successful in 2011 election, which could be harming to Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party could decline to apply the steps.
Economic factors
Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis includes qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis's port is among the largest established port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. The nation has an excellent reputation and has a stable currency. The country also has a high growth rate. Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis relies a lot on export and tourism. It doesn't have any resources of raw material. Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis is generally a link between east and west. The development of port will develop a number of chances of trade. Other countries like China and India might cause a threat to Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
Literacy rate is very high and it has the Fourth most affordable infant mortality rate. Population development rate of Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center.
Legal factors
Lone Star Power Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are properly implemented. It provides minority investors defense with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial guideline are indicated in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, because justices are selected on guidance of PM.