Pestel Analysis of Jaguar Cars Case Study Solution

Home >> Kelloggs >> Jaguar Cars >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Jaguar Cars Case Help

Political factors

Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption complimentary image. It is amongst the least corrupt nations of Asia. Although, some political processes are doing not have, along with civil liberties and human rights. Workers celebration was successful in 2011 election, which might be harming to Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis's image because this celebration could decline to apply the measures.

Economic factors

Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of conserving. Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other nations like China and India might trigger a risk to Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is very high and it has the fourth lowest infant mortality rate. The 100% population of Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the most affordable number of kids per female worldwide. Life span rate of Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisJaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Jaguar Cars Case Pestel Analysis has ease of fixing solvency and the Laws are appropriately implemented. It uses minority shareholders protection with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial regulation are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has efficient public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is bad, since justices are appointed on suggestions of PM.