Pestel Analysis of Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Study Solution

Disclaimer: This page contains sample case solution for formatting purposes only and is not the actual case solution of the said case. To get the actual case solution; order on website or contact live chat support.

Home >> Kelloggs >> Cyntergy Electric Inc >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Help

Political factors

Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption complimentary image. Workers party was successful in 2011 election, which might be damaging to Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Pestel Analysis's image since this party could refuse to apply the steps.

Economic factors

Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other countries like China and India may trigger a threat to Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the Fourth least expensive baby death rate. Population growth rate of Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center. Its intellectual property protection is also very strong. The federal government can increase the budget for R&D.

Legal factors

Cyntergy Electric Inc Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are appropriately enforced. It uses minority shareholders security with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced monetary policy are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has efficient public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is bad, because justices are designated on recommendations of PM.