Pestel Analysis of Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Study Solution

Home >> Kelloggs >> Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Help

Political factors

Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. Employees celebration was successful in 2011 election, which might be harming to Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Pestel Analysis's image since this party might decline to apply the procedures.

Economic factors

Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other countries like China and India may trigger a threat to Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is really high and it has the 4th least expensive infant mortality rate. Population development rate of Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Compensation Planning At Stanford University In The 21st Century Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are properly enforced. It provides minority investors protection with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced financial guideline are indicated in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, given that justices are designated on guidance of PM.