Pestel Analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Study Analysis

Disclaimer: This page contains sample case solution for formatting purposes only and is not the actual case solution of the said case. To get the actual case solution; order on website or contact live chat support.

Home >> Kelloggs >> Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Analysis

Political factors

Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption complimentary image. Employees party was successful in 2011 election, which could be harming to Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party might refuse to use the procedures.

Economic factors

Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified labor force and has high levels of saving. Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest established port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. Other countries like China and India may trigger a threat to Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the 4th lowest baby mortality rate. Population growth rate of Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic hub.

Legal factors

Coke Versus Pepsi 2001 Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are properly implemented. It uses minority shareholders protection with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial regulation are suggested in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal developments can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, since justices are appointed on guidance of PM.