Pestel Analysis of Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Study Help

Home >> Ivey >> Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Solution

Political factors

Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. It is among the least corrupt countries of Asia. Although, some political processes are lacking, along with civil liberties and human rights. Workers celebration was successful in 2011 election, which could be damaging to Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Pestel Analysis's image because this celebration could refuse to apply the steps.

Economic factors

Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of conserving. Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other nations like China and India may trigger a danger to Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th lowest infant mortality rate. Population growth rate of Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisXerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Xerox Corp Leadership Through Quality B Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It offers minority shareholders protection with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced financial policy are indicated in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has effective public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is bad, considering that justices are selected on advice of PM.