Pestel Analysis of Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Study Analysis
Home >> Ivey >> Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Solution
Political factors
Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption complimentary image. Workers party was effective in 2011 election, which could be damaging to Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis's image because this celebration could refuse to apply the steps.
Economic factors
Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis includes qualified labor force and has high levels of saving. Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. The country has a terrific credibility and has a stable currency. The country also has a high development rate. Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis relies a lot on export and tourism. It doesn't have any resources of raw material. Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis is basically a link between east and west. The development of port will produce several chances of trade. Other nations like China and India may trigger a risk to Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
Literacy rate is very high and it has the Fourth least expensive infant death rate. Population growth rate of Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic hub.
Legal factors
Whos In Charge The Jim Davis Case Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It provides minority investors protection with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial guideline are suggested in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, because justices are selected on suggestions of PM.