Pestel Analysis of United Rentals A Case Study Help

Home >> Ivey >> United Rentals A >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of United Rentals A Case Help

Political factors

United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption complimentary image. Employees celebration was successful in 2011 election, which could be harming to United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this celebration might decline to apply the steps.

Economic factors

United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified workforce and has high levels of saving. United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. Other nations like China and India may trigger a risk to United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis's population lies in between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the fourth least expensive baby mortality rate. The 100% population of United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis is urban with the lowest number of kids per female worldwide. Life span rate of United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisUnited Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center. Its intellectual property protection is likewise very strong. The government can increase the budget for R&D.

Legal factors

United Rentals A Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are effectively imposed. It uses minority investors security with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary policy are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has efficient public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, considering that justices are designated on guidance of PM.