Pestel Analysis of Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Study Solution

Disclaimer: This page contains sample case solution for formatting purposes only and is not the actual case solution of the said case. To get the actual case solution; order on website or contact live chat support.

Home >> Ivey >> Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Help

Political factors

Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption totally free image. Workers celebration was successful in 2011 election, which might be damaging to Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Pestel Analysis's image since this celebration might refuse to use the procedures.

Economic factors

Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified workforce and has high levels of saving. Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial taxation system. Other countries like China and India might trigger a hazard to Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th least expensive baby mortality rate. Population development rate of Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Oppenheimerfunds And Take Two Interactive A Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It offers minority shareholders defense with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced monetary regulation are suggested in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has efficient public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is bad, because justices are selected on suggestions of PM.