Pestel Analysis of Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Study Solution

Home >> Ivey >> Novartis Ag Science Based Business >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Solution

Political factors

Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. It is among the least corrupt nations of Asia. Although, some political procedures are lacking, along with civil liberties and human rights. Workers party achieved success in 2011 election, which might be harming to Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Pestel Analysis's image because this party could refuse to apply the measures.

Economic factors

Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other countries like China and India may trigger a danger to Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is really high and it has the Fourth least expensive baby mortality rate. Population growth rate of Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisNovartis Ag Science Based Business Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Novartis Ag Science Based Business Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are effectively enforced. It uses minority shareholders defense with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary guideline are indicated in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, considering that justices are selected on recommendations of PM.