Pestel Analysis of Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Study Analysis
Home >> Ivey >> Merck Latin America D Mexico >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Help
Political factors
Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. Workers party was effective in 2011 election, which might be damaging to Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis's image considering that this celebration might refuse to apply the procedures.
Economic factors
Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified labor force and has high levels of saving. Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial taxation system. Other countries like China and India may cause a threat to Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
The 55% of Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is very high and it has the fourth least expensive baby death rate. The 100% population of Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis is urban with the most affordable variety of kids per woman on the planet. Life expectancy rate of Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population growth rate of Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center. Its intellectual property security is also very strong. The federal government can increase the budget for R&D.
Legal factors
Merck Latin America D Mexico Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It offers minority shareholders defense with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary regulation are suggested in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has efficient public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is bad, since justices are appointed on recommendations of PM.