Pestel Analysis of London Symphony Orchestra B Case Study Help
Home >> Ivey >> London Symphony Orchestra B >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of London Symphony Orchestra B Case Solution
Political factors
London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption totally free image. Employees party was successful in 2011 election, which might be harming to London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party could refuse to use the measures.
Economic factors
London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of conserving. London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest established port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other countries like China and India may trigger a risk to London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
The 55% of London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th most affordable infant death rate. The 100% population of London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the lowest number of kids per lady in the world. Life span rate of London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic hub. Its intellectual property security is also really strong. The government can increase the budget plan for R&D.
Legal factors
London Symphony Orchestra B Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are properly imposed. It provides minority shareholders defense with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary guideline are indicated in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is bad, since justices are designated on advice of PM.