Pestel Analysis of Ll Bean Latin America Case Study Analysis
Home >> Ivey >> Ll Bean Latin America >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Ll Bean Latin America Case Solution
Political factors
Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. Employees celebration was effective in 2011 election, which might be damaging to Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis's image considering that this celebration could decline to apply the measures.
Economic factors
Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other countries like China and India may trigger a danger to Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
The 55% of Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis's population lies in between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is really high and it has the 4th most affordable infant mortality rate. The 100% population of Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the lowest number of kids per lady in the world. Life expectancy rate of Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population growth rate of Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.
Legal factors
Ll Bean Latin America Case Pestel Analysis has ease of fixing solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It provides minority investors protection with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial regulation are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has effective public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is bad, since justices are appointed on guidance of PM.