Pestel Analysis of Linda Fay Harris Case Study Help

Disclaimer: This page contains sample case solution for formatting purposes only and is not the actual case solution of the said case. To get the actual case solution; order on website or contact live chat support.

Home >> Ivey >> Linda Fay Harris >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Linda Fay Harris Case Help

Political factors

Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption complimentary image. Employees celebration was effective in 2011 election, which could be harming to Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party could refuse to use the measures.

Economic factors

Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other countries like China and India might cause a threat to Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is really high and it has the fourth least expensive infant death rate. The 100% population of Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis is urban with the lowest number of kids per female on the planet. Life span rate of Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Linda Fay Harris Case Pestel Analysis has ease of fixing solvency and the Laws are correctly imposed. It uses minority investors defense with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced monetary guideline are suggested in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, considering that justices are appointed on recommendations of PM.