Pestel Analysis of Levi Strauss And Co D Case Study Help

Home >> Ivey >> Levi Strauss And Co D >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Levi Strauss And Co D Case Help

Political factors

Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption totally free image. Employees celebration was successful in 2011 election, which might be harming to Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party might refuse to use the steps.

Economic factors

Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other countries like China and India may cause a risk to Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis's population lies in between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the 4th lowest baby death rate. The 100% population of Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis is city with the lowest variety of kids per lady in the world. Life span rate of Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisLevi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic hub.

Legal factors

Levi Strauss And Co D Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are correctly imposed. It uses minority shareholders defense with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary guideline are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has efficient public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, considering that justices are designated on advice of PM.