Pestel Analysis of Erik Peterson C Case Study Help

Home >> Ivey >> Erik Peterson C >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Erik Peterson C Case Help

Political factors

Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. Employees party was effective in 2011 election, which might be damaging to Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis's image because this party might decline to use the measures.

Economic factors

Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified workforce and has high levels of conserving. Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. The nation has an excellent reputation and has a steady currency. The country also has a high development rate. Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis relies a lot on export and tourist. It does not have any resources of basic material. Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis is basically a link in between east and west. The advancement of port will produce several opportunities of trade. Other nations like China and India may cause a threat to Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th most affordable baby mortality rate. Population growth rate of Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisErik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center. Its intellectual property security is also really strong. The federal government can increase the spending plan for R&D.

Legal factors

Erik Peterson C Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are appropriately enforced. It uses minority investors security with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced monetary guideline are implied in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has reliable public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is poor, given that justices are appointed on recommendations of PM.