Pestel Analysis of Erik Peterson B Case Study Analysis
Home >> Ivey >> Erik Peterson B >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Erik Peterson B Case Solution
Political factors
Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. It is among the least corrupt countries of Asia. Although, some political processes are lacking, in addition to civil liberties and human rights. Employees celebration achieved success in 2011 election, which might be harming to Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this celebration could decline to use the measures.
Economic factors
Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis includes certified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis's port is among the biggest recognized port by trade volume with favorable tax system. The country has a great credibility and has a steady currency. The country likewise has a high growth rate. Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis relies a lot on export and tourism. It does not have any resources of raw material. Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis is basically a link between east and west. The advancement of port will develop numerous chances of trade. Other countries like China and India may cause a risk to Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
Literacy rate is really high and it has the 4th most affordable infant death rate. Population development rate of Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center. Its copyright defense is also very strong. The federal government can increase the spending plan for R&D.
Legal factors
Erik Peterson B Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are appropriately enforced. It offers minority investors defense with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary regulation are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal developments can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, since justices are appointed on recommendations of PM.