Pestel Analysis of Driving Change At Seagate Case Study Help

Home >> Ivey >> Driving Change At Seagate >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Driving Change At Seagate Case Analysis

Political factors

Driving Change At Seagate Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. It is among the least corrupt nations of Asia. Although, some political processes are lacking, along with civil liberties and human rights. Workers party was successful in 2011 election, which might be damaging to Driving Change At Seagate Case Pestel Analysis's image since this celebration might decline to use the measures.

Economic factors

Driving Change At Seagate Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified workforce and has high levels of saving. Driving Change At Seagate Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest established port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. Other nations like China and India might cause a danger to Driving Change At Seagate Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is really high and it has the 4th least expensive infant death rate. Population development rate of Driving Change At Seagate Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisDriving Change At Seagate Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center. Its copyright security is likewise extremely strong. The government can increase the spending plan for R&D.

Legal factors

Driving Change At Seagate Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are correctly imposed. It uses minority investors security with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced financial guideline are suggested in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is poor, given that justices are designated on guidance of PM.