Pestel Analysis of Dewberry Capital Case Study Help
Home >> Ivey >> Dewberry Capital >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Dewberry Capital Case Help
Political factors
Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption free image. Employees party was successful in 2011 election, which might be harming to Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this celebration could refuse to use the procedures.
Economic factors
Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial taxation system. Other nations like China and India may trigger a threat to Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
The 55% of Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the fourth least expensive infant death rate. The 100% population of Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the lowest variety of kids per female worldwide. Life expectancy rate of Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population growth rate of Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic hub. Its intellectual property security is likewise extremely strong. The government can increase the spending plan for R&D.
Legal factors
Dewberry Capital Case Pestel Analysis has ease of fixing solvency and the Laws are properly implemented. It provides minority investors protection with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary policy are indicated in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has efficient public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is poor, because justices are selected on recommendations of PM.