Pestel Analysis of Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Study Analysis

Home >> Ivey >> Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Help

Political factors

Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption complimentary image. It is amongst the least corrupt nations of Asia. Although, some political procedures are lacking, in addition to civil liberties and human rights. Employees party succeeded in 2011 election, which could be harming to Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party might decline to use the procedures.

Economic factors

Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of conserving. Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. Other countries like China and India may cause a threat to Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the 4th most affordable baby death rate. Population development rate of Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisDelivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Delivering Strategic Human Resource Management Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It uses minority investors protection with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced monetary regulation are indicated in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is bad, since justices are designated on recommendations of PM.