Pestel Analysis of Dansko Inc Case Study Help

Home >> Ivey >> Dansko Inc >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Dansko Inc Case Analysis

Political factors

Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption totally free image. It is amongst the least corrupt countries of Asia. Some political processes are lacking, along with civil liberties and human rights. Workers celebration was successful in 2011 election, which could be harming to Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis's image since this celebration could refuse to use the measures.

Economic factors

Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other countries like China and India might cause a threat to Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is really high and it has the 4th most affordable baby death rate. The 100% population of Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the lowest variety of kids per woman on the planet. Life expectancy rate of Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population growth rate of Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisDansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Dansko Inc Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are effectively imposed. It uses minority investors protection with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial guideline are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has reliable public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is bad, considering that justices are appointed on guidance of PM.