Pestel Analysis of Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Study Solution
Home >> Ivey >> Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Solution
Political factors
Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption totally free image. Workers party was successful in 2011 election, which could be damaging to Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis's image considering that this celebration could refuse to apply the measures.
Economic factors
Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other countries like China and India might cause a risk to Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
The 55% of Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th least expensive baby death rate. The 100% population of Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis is urban with the most affordable variety of kids per woman worldwide. Life span rate of Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic hub.
Legal factors
Citigroup Wachovia Wells Fargo Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are properly implemented. It uses minority investors protection with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial regulation are indicated in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has efficient public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is bad, since justices are designated on suggestions of PM.