Pestel Analysis of Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Study Analysis

Home >> Ivey >> Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Solution

Political factors

Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption free image. Employees celebration was effective in 2011 election, which might be harming to Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Pestel Analysis's image considering that this party might refuse to use the steps.

Economic factors

Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of conserving. Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest established port by trade volume with favorable taxation system. Other countries like China and India might cause a danger to Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th least expensive baby death rate. Population development rate of Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisCeo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connection. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center. Its intellectual property security is likewise really strong. The federal government can increase the budget for R&D.

Legal factors

Ceo Compensation At Ge A Decade With Jeff Immelt Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It offers minority shareholders protection with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary policy are indicated in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has efficient public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is poor, considering that justices are designated on recommendations of PM.