Pestel Analysis of Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Study Solution
Home >> Ivey >> Beverly Stern Retail Executive >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Solution
Political factors
Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption totally free image. It is amongst the least corrupt countries of Asia. Although, some political processes are lacking, in addition to civil liberties and human rights. Workers celebration achieved success in 2011 election, which might be harming to Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Pestel Analysis's image because this party could decline to use the measures.
Economic factors
Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. Other countries like China and India may trigger a threat to Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
Literacy rate is very high and it has the Fourth most affordable infant mortality rate. Population growth rate of Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center. Its copyright protection is also very strong. The government can increase the budget plan for R&D.
Legal factors
Beverly Stern Retail Executive Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are correctly imposed. It offers minority investors security with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary regulation are suggested in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is poor, given that justices are selected on recommendations of PM.