Pestel Analysis of Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Study Analysis
Home >> Ivey >> Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update >> Pestel Analysis
Pestel Analysis of Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Help
Political factors
Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. Employees celebration was successful in 2011 election, which might be harming to Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Pestel Analysis's image since this celebration might decline to apply the steps.
Economic factors
Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified labor force and has high levels of saving. Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other nations like China and India might trigger a risk to Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Pestel Analysis.
Social factors
Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the 4th lowest infant death rate. Population development rate of Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Pestel Analysis is low.
Technological factors
Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic hub. Its intellectual property security is also extremely strong. The federal government can increase the spending plan for R&D.
Legal factors
Becton Dickinson B1 Global Management Update Case Pestel Analysis has ease of fixing solvency and the Laws are effectively implemented. It provides minority investors protection with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary guideline are implied in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is bad, considering that justices are appointed on guidance of PM.