Pestel Analysis of 2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Study Solution

Home >> Ivey >> 2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of 2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Solution

Political factors

2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption free image. Employees party was successful in 2011 election, which could be damaging to 2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Pestel Analysis's image considering that this celebration could decline to use the measures.

Economic factors

2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified labor force and has high levels of saving. 2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial taxation system. Other countries like China and India may cause a risk to 2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the Fourth most affordable baby death rate. Population growth rate of 2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel Analysis2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center. Its copyright security is likewise very strong. The federal government can increase the spending plan for R&D.

Legal factors

2012 Obama Campaign Learning In The Field Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are correctly imposed. It uses minority shareholders defense with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated monetary policy are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has effective public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, given that justices are selected on suggestions of PM.