Pestel Analysis of Thaifoon Restaurant Case Study Help

Home >> Harvard >> Thaifoon Restaurant >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Thaifoon Restaurant Case Help

Political factors

Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption complimentary image. Employees party was effective in 2011 election, which could be harming to Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis's image because this party could decline to apply the steps.

Economic factors

Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified labor force and has high levels of saving. Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other countries like China and India may cause a risk to Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th lowest infant mortality rate. The 100% population of Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis is urban with the most affordable number of kids per lady worldwide. Life expectancy rate of Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisThaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center. Its intellectual property defense is likewise really strong. The government can increase the budget for R&D.

Legal factors

Thaifoon Restaurant Case Pestel Analysis has ease of dealing with solvency and the Laws are properly enforced. It provides minority investors defense with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial guideline are suggested in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has reliable public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial independence is bad, considering that justices are selected on guidance of PM.