Executive Summary of Quorum Health Group Inc Case Study Analysis
Home >> Harvard >> Quorum Health Group Inc >> Executive Summary
Executive Summary of Quorum Health Group Inc Case Analysis
An essential symbol for power and economic strength-- American capitalism of unmatched productivity and wealth, the strength of developing a nation which is in recent times the resentment of the world. However, on the report of Milton Friedman, the terminology 'commercialism' has actually known to have drastic variable and highly relative meaning. To some degree, the industrialism is a term of opprobrium which represents the persecution of small modest companies through ruthless prodigious monopolies; while, near others considers it as a hope that symbolizes males's flexibility in order to shape their own fates of economy. The unleashing energy and resourcefulness of human to raise the living requirement of masses.
According to Charles Fishman, Quorum Health Group Inc Case Executive Summary is a huge story of success in America as transformative and a secret force in the economy of America. The Quorum Health Group Inc Case Executive Summary Effect and a Good Society elaborates the mega corporation's actions and bring the effect of their positive and unfavorable actions mainly on stakeholders. A concept has been promoted by the authors that if Quorum Health Group Inc Case Executive Summary and other mega corporations satisfy the expectations of civil society in the matter of social wellness, safety, health and the environment might serve as a good example for moving the method company has been performed in the worldwide market i.e. to do well-- undoubtedly, to do better-- by doing great.
Citation of Quorum Health Group Inc Case Executive Summary as the embodiment of commercialism in America includes usage of definite examples together with remarkable facts and information for sustaining a fascinating yet alluring question--" How do we guarantee that American commercialism produces a decent society for everyone in the era ahead?"
Therefore, it is in some way considered critical for the establishment of what H. Lee Scott avoid during his use of term a good society. Rather, a credible thought school would perhaps describes a good society as a civilization i.e. characterized through a jet set quality with exceptional power of acquiring and ideal conditions of economy which were initiated through the companies that succeed in sustainability by showing fantastic requirements of principles and continuous going beyond the CSR (Corporate Social Obligation) restricts to supply advantage to their neighborhoods at regional level. As an illustration, this type of society would simultaneously believed to be balanced, progressive, efficient, competitive and free of social evils.
The society's stalwarts in spite of the truth that push for constant growth and development is expected to highly advocate the well-being of neighborhood. Such an advanced will of a society, in particular, continuously strive for production of products with get rid of inferior and work with those produced in an illegitimate way. Business in such type of societies undergo rigorous measures of business governance. Effective policies of government refer to the laws of anti-trust guaranteeing that monopolies neither exist nor develop.
Thinking about above discussed example of an ideal society, it appears relatable for measurement where there is a contrast of modern day in society of United States of America. The thing which is worried to be more complicated is based on the economy of commercialism consisting of individuals who are accountable to make choices on their own and have the right to handle standard resources needed in performance and that in contradiction are the choices which are followed to in a grander plan made under the organizational forms of non-capitalists by the government.
People as customers are able to choose which undoubtedly favour such organizations in making them monopolistic in nature in an effective manner as witnessed in Quorum Health Group Inc Case Executive Summary's case. Nevertheless, such actual monopolist nature can not be discovered in the landscape of competitive industrialism. Because, it is mainly governed under supply and demand of the laws, it is for that reason impossible that organizations have the capability to grow at larger scale and effort of unrelenting pressure on further company with frustrating effects. For the case in point, the possibility of driving them towards establishment to whatever conditions they are dealing with to please their providers, keeping terms of confidentiality or power exertion of imbalanced bargaining. For that reason, these all actions are in contradiction with the commercialism laws of America.
The question is how come this matter can be resolved for ensuring that for society the benefits are produced through commercialism while keeping checks of its negative impact? In result, the legal system of America failed in acknowledgment of companies that may show potential growth enough for dominance of economy itself.
The ethical requirements are developed on the facilities of principles that is a critical issue under taking all societies along with big organizations who have the duty of preserving high principles of requirements in their operations of service. The commercialism acceptance is the best system of economy and the incentive of larger profit engaging mega-corporations to comply.
The approach of a company for its stakeholders is thought about as a significant element in such battle. Historically, the requirement of mind-set was to get to the top of the big organizations that has actually run counter for perspective adoption of stakeholder in the value development process. The requirement of big organizations to record sustainable value at present to see worth of stakeholders is essential for the organizational development. Power of stakeholders is now thought be a truth in the environment of service at international level. Magnate who tempt to stop working for adoption of brand-new risk of mind-set put their corporations and professions in danger. Thus, it is critical for leaders of mega corporation in brand-new age to comprehend the difference in between old and brand-new mind-set of stakeholder's value and its effects on their organisation for initiation of a requisite strategy.
Conclusively, the issue of public law need federal government intervention. Moderately, the tightening up of laws of anti-trust is imminent however furthermore the lack of information is supplied to people about present big capitalistic mega-corporations tend to be a substantial concern that requires to be attended to with abrupt effect. Application of these actions will act as the nascent procedures followed to assure that commercialism in America produces a good society for all in upcoming era.