Pestel Analysis of John Preston Case Study Solution

Home >> Harvard >> John Preston >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of John Preston Case Help

Political factors

John Preston Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption free image. Employees celebration was successful in 2011 election, which could be damaging to John Preston Case Pestel Analysis's image given that this party could refuse to apply the measures.

Economic factors

John Preston Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of conserving. John Preston Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with beneficial taxation system. Other countries like China and India might cause a threat to John Preston Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of John Preston Case Pestel Analysis's population lies between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th most affordable infant mortality rate. The 100% population of John Preston Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the lowest variety of kids per female worldwide. Life expectancy rate of John Preston Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population growth rate of John Preston Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisJohn Preston Case Pestel Analysis has largest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic hub. Its intellectual property security is also very strong. The federal government can increase the budget plan for R&D.

Legal factors

John Preston Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are properly enforced. It uses minority shareholders defense with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced financial regulation are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has reliable public administration. The enhancements in judiciary can be made. English can be embraced as the legal tradition. Legal developments can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, because justices are designated on recommendations of PM.