Pestel Analysis of General Electric Valley Forge G Case Study Help

Disclaimer: This page contains sample case solution for formatting purposes only and is not the actual case solution of the said case. To get the actual case solution; order on website or contact live chat support.

Home >> Harvard >> General Electric Valley Forge G >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of General Electric Valley Forge G Case Solution

Political factors

General Electric Valley Forge G Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption complimentary image. Workers party was successful in 2011 election, which might be damaging to General Electric Valley Forge G Case Pestel Analysis's image since this celebration might refuse to apply the procedures.

Economic factors

General Electric Valley Forge G Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. General Electric Valley Forge G Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest established port by trade volume with beneficial taxation system. Other nations like China and India may cause a risk to General Electric Valley Forge G Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the 4th most affordable infant mortality rate. Population growth rate of General Electric Valley Forge G Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

General Electric Valley Forge G Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connection. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.

Legal factors

General Electric Valley Forge G Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are properly implemented. It offers minority investors protection with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced monetary guideline are implied in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has effective public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is poor, since justices are appointed on advice of PM.