Pestel Analysis of American Chemical Corp Case Study Analysis

Home >> Harvard >> American Chemical Corp >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of American Chemical Corp Case Help

Political factors

American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis has a tidy and corruption free image. It is among the least corrupt nations of Asia. Some political procedures are doing not have, along with civil liberties and human rights. Employees party was successful in 2011 election, which could be harming to American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis's image because this celebration might decline to use the procedures.

Economic factors

American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis consists of qualified workforce and has high levels of saving. American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. Other countries like China and India might trigger a risk to American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

The 55% of American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis's population lies in between 25 and 54. Literacy rate is extremely high and it has the 4th lowest infant mortality rate. The 100% population of American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis is metropolitan with the lowest number of kids per lady worldwide. Life span rate of American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis is 84 years. Population development rate of American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisAmerican Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic hub.

Legal factors

American Chemical Corp Case Pestel Analysis has ease of fixing solvency and the Laws are properly imposed. It uses minority investors security with effective criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced monetary policy are indicated in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal custom. Legal advancements can be made. The judicial self-reliance is bad, because justices are selected on guidance of PM.