Pestel Analysis of Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Study Help

Home >> Harvard >> Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Help

Political factors

Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption totally free image. It is among the least corrupt nations of Asia. Although, some political procedures are doing not have, along with civil liberties and human rights. Employees celebration was successful in 2011 election, which might be harming to Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Pestel Analysis's image since this celebration could refuse to use the measures.

Economic factors

Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified workforce and has high levels of conserving. Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the largest established port by trade volume with favorable tax system. Other countries like China and India might trigger a hazard to Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the Fourth most affordable infant mortality rate. Population development rate of Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisAbu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a seamless connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is considered as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Abu Dhabi National Hotels What Went Wrong Case Pestel Analysis has ease of solving solvency and the Laws are appropriately enforced. It provides minority investors protection with efficient criminal system and specialized courts. Advanced financial guideline are indicated in the country and has a transparent legal environment. It also has effective public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal developments can be made. The judicial self-reliance is poor, given that justices are designated on suggestions of PM.