Pestel Analysis of Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Study Analysis

Home >> Chicago Booth >> Yee Ching Lilian Chan >> Pestel Analysis

Pestel Analysis of Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Solution

Political factors

Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis has a clean and corruption complimentary image. Workers party was effective in 2011 election, which might be damaging to Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis's image considering that this celebration could refuse to use the measures.

Economic factors

Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis consists of certified workforce and has high levels of conserving. Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis's port is one of the biggest recognized port by trade volume with beneficial tax system. The country has a terrific credibility and has a steady currency. The country also has a high development rate. Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis relies a lot on export and tourism. It doesn't have any resources of basic material. Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis is basically a link in between east and west. The advancement of port will create a number of opportunities of trade. Other countries like China and India might cause a danger to Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis.

Social factors

Literacy rate is very high and it has the 4th lowest infant mortality rate. Population development rate of Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis is low.

Technological factors

Pestel AnalysisYee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis has biggest telecommunication networks all around the world, with a smooth connectivity. It has world's busiest port and is thought about as a logistic center.

Legal factors

Yee Ching Lilian Chan Case Pestel Analysis has ease of resolving solvency and the Laws are correctly enforced. It offers minority investors defense with reliable criminal system and specialized courts. Sophisticated financial regulation are implied in the nation and has a transparent legal environment. It likewise has efficient public administration. The improvements in judiciary can be made. English can be adopted as the legal tradition. Legal developments can be made. The judicial independence is bad, given that justices are appointed on guidance of PM.